Sell My Software Development Agency – AI-Powered Brokerage & Valuation
Thinking of an exit? Get a data-driven valuation, a buyer-ready package, and a confidential process designed for software services firms.
How Much Is My Software Agency Worth?
Short answer: Valuation ≈ Profit (SDE/EBITDA) × market multiple, adjusted for revenue mix (retainers vs projects), growth, client concentration, utilisation, gross margin, backlog/pipeline, staff dependency, and contract quality.
Valuation, in brief (5 steps)
- Choose method: SDE multiple for owner‑operated shops; EBITDA for larger, systemised firms.
- Normalise metrics: revenue by stream (retainers/projects/T&M/fixed‑bid), gross margin, utilisation, backlog, add‑backs.
- Benchmark with comps: niche/tech stack, size band, onshore/offshore mix, certifications, client GEO, win rate.
- Adjust for risk: client concentration, key‑person reliance, contractor model, IP & assignments, churn/tenure.
- Run scenarios: base / upside / de‑risked (e.g., more retainers, higher utilisation), then set a defensible range.
Agency Valuation Multiples in 2025 (Indicative)
Ranges vary by size, quality, and buyer type. Treat these as directional bands, not guarantees.
Profile | Basis | Indicative Range* |
---|---|---|
Owner‑operated, <$500k annual profit | SDE multiple | ~2.0×–3.5× SDE |
$500k–$2m annual profit, steady growth | EBITDA multiple | ~3.5×–5.5× EBITDA |
$2m+ annual profit, strong retainers & low concentration | EBITDA multiple | ~5.0×–7.5× EBITDA |
*Illustrative bands only; outcomes depend on growth, retention/tenure, margins, utilisation, client mix, risk, buyer type, and market conditions.
How We Value Agencies: Mix, Margin, Utilisation, Concentration
Driver | Strong Signal | Effect on Multiple |
---|---|---|
Revenue Mix | 50%+ retainers or multi‑year MSAs | Higher (recurring/visibility) |
Gross Margin | ≥ 45–55% services margin with rate discipline | Higher (pricing power) |
Utilisation | Billable utilisation ≥ 75–80% | Higher (efficiency) |
Client Concentration | No client > 15–20% of revenue | Higher (lower volatility) |
Backlog & Pipeline | 3–6 months coverage; CRM‑tracked win rate | Higher (durability of revenue) |
People Risk | Documented SOPs, cross‑training; limited key‑person dependence | Higher (transferability) |
SDE vs EBITDA for Agencies: Which One Matters?
Smaller, owner‑led agencies are commonly priced on SDE (profit + reasonable owner compensation + normalised add‑backs). Larger, systemised firms trend to EBITDA. We compute both and align to the buyer pool.
How our AI model improves the valuation
- Maps your metrics to live agency comps (size, mix, margin, utilisation, concentration).
- Runs sensitivity on utilisation, rate card, and retainer share to show multiple uplift.
- Ranks buyer fit (strategic vs financial) to indicate likely price/structure scenarios.
What to prepare (faster valuation)
- Last 24 months P&L/BS/CF; revenue by client/stream; WIP and AR ageing; backlog & pipeline.
- Rate cards, utilisation reports, staffing plan; contractor vs employee mix; turnover figures.
- Client/MSA/SOW contracts (assignability), SLAs, renewal history, satisfaction/NPS.
- Top 20 clients with % revenue; sector/GEO mix; channel/partner dependencies.
- IP & assignments: contributor agreements, OSS policy, licences, trademarks.
Quick answers:
Revenue or profit multiple? Mostly SDE/EBITDA for agencies; revenue multiples are rare and reserved for exceptional scale/specialism.
What improves my multiple fastest? More retainers, better utilisation/rates, lower client concentration, and clean IP/assignments.
Staffing model? Buyers favour stable core teams with documented SOPs and scalable contractor benches.